The concept of superior semicircular can now the distance
is very interesting.
It is based on a mobile third window.
Here is the concept in a simple analogy.
Hearing and Balance function are housed in the same organ,
and share the same fluid. Hearing
is based on vibrations. Sound waves
pushes in (and then out) on the oval window, forcing fluid to oscillate
through a long tube and bulges the round window out (and then in) at the
other end.
That is like having a building with a long hallway,
with two doors at either end. If
the entire hallway is packed with people, and another person enters... somebody
must exit at the other end. The
traffic movement at that other end is detected as sound.

The balance function on the other hand is a closed
system, set up like a race track. Movement
of the fluid (or people- as in our analogy) within the racetrack is detected as
head movement.
As it turns out, the racetrack is connected to the
long hallway. Now, as long as the
racetrack is intact, the hallway and the racetrack function independently.
However if another door or window is opened in the racetrack, then people
can leak out of that window. That
would decrease the traffic of the original exit (the round window), decreasing
the sensation of sound. It would
increase the traffic through the racetrack, which would be detected as increased
head movement when there really was none. (Sensation
of movement when there is none is called vertigo).
As a point of clarification, all of these windows are
typically still covered with a membrane, so that the fluid does not actually
leak out. Since we are really
talking about pulses and vibrations, it is the energy of these pulses and
vibrations that is "leaking out".
(The fluid does not need to leak out for the energy to leak out).
The
leaky window is the superior semicircular canal dehiscence.
Therefore closure of that window can help stop both the sensation of
dizziness and improve conductive hearing loss.
Surgical Treatment
There are two ways to surgically
repair a superior semicircular canal dehiscence. One way is to cover the window by placing something on top of
the window. The other way is to
plug the canal (racetrack).
Each method has its own risks and
benefits. The patient has two weigh
out his or her own risks and benefits with the symptoms that are present.
Sometimes the choice is already
made for you because so much of the canal is dehiscent (exposed) that any
attempt to cover it will crush the canal and in effect plug it.
Middle Fossa Resurfacing:
The idea is to prevent the leakage
of fluid pressure energy, while maintaining continuity of the fluid flow
internally by covering the window with a firm solid substance.
This is done with a small piece of
bone that is laid on top of the weakened (dehiscent) area.
Synthetic bone paste is used to "concrete mortar" that piece of
bone in place. This procedure
involves opening up a window in the skull and lifting up the brain to get to the
area of the leak.
Canal plugging:
The idea is to block the fluid
flow through the semicircular canals, thereby shutting down the sensors so that
the false sensation of motion is prevented.
Abnormal fluid flow causes so much dizziness and distress that it is
better to have no fluid flow than abnormal flow.
This can be done either through a
middle fossa approach, or through the trans-mastoid approach.
The trans-mastoid approach is done through an incision behind the ear.
It does not involve any manipulation of the brain, and thus is less risky
neurologically. However, the
mastoid approach is slightly more risky to the hearing and facial nerve.
For a full discussion on the relative risks and
benefits in your particular case, have a face-to-face consultation with a
Neurotologist who is well versed in this field.